The No Kings Protest: Examining Trump’s Alleged Authoritarianism from All Sides. Government Reform Needed NOW!
- Jeremy Black

- Oct 18
- 3 min read
Updated: 3 days ago

In the heart of America, on October 18, 2025, millions gathered for the “No Kings” protests, a nationwide movement decrying what participants view as President Donald Trump’s escalating abuses of power. From New York City to Los Angeles, crowds filled streets with signs reading “No Kings in America” and chants echoing demands for accountability. This second wave of demonstrations, organized by groups like the ACLU and NoKings.org, highlights deep divisions in the U.S. political landscape amid concerns over presidential immunity, executive overreach, and authoritarian tendencies. As the author of Rare Sense to Save America, (https://a.co/d/dmxAYjK) , I believe these events underscore the need for Rare sense in our politics to prevent extremes from tearing the nation apart. Let’s explore the No Kings Protest through Democratic, Republican, and Independent lenses, while reviewing claims that Trump is acting like a king.
Democratic Viewpoints on the No Kings Protest
Democrats have been at the forefront of the No Kings movement, viewing it as a critical stand against Trump’s “authoritarian power grab.” Leaders like House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries have praised the peaceful protests as “the American way,” emphasizing resistance to an “out of control President.” Protesters, including veterans like Tom Mossey, who stated, “I didn’t deploy three times for this bullshit,” argue that Trump’s executive actions, such as issuing executive orders and using government shutdowns to redirect funds, erode democratic norms. For Democrats, the protests are about protecting the Constitution from what they see as monarchical overreach, fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity that some say grants “the power of a king.”
Republican Viewpoints on the No Kings Protest
Republicans, on the other hand, have largely dismissed the No Kings protests as exaggerated and unpatriotic. GOP rhetoric labels the rallies as “hate America” events, with some accusing activists of being violent or anti-American. President Trump and his allies, including Vivek Ramaswamy, have mocked the movement, pointing out that America already rejected kings in 1776 and that the protests ignore Trump’s electoral mandate. Supporters argue that Trump’s actions, such as expanding surveillance or using executive powers, are necessary to fulfill campaign promises on security and economic reform, not signs of dictatorship. One X user quipped that the protests are “worthless like the people in it,” reflecting a sentiment that the movement is driven by sore losers rather than genuine concerns.
Independent Viewpoints on the No Kings Protest
Independents offer a mixed but often critical perspective, bridging partisan divides. Senator Bernie Sanders, an Independent (though leftist), headlined rallies, framing the protests as an “antidote” to Trump’s clampdown on free speech and other policies. Libertarian-leaning voices, like the Cornhusker Libertarian on X, join the fray by criticizing Trump’s “horrifying expansion of the digital surveillance police state” and “shredding of our Constitution,” disappointed that conservatives aren’t protesting alongside. However, some Independents see irony in Democrats protesting “no kings” after selecting Kamala Harris without primary votes, viewing both parties as complicit in power consolidation. Overall, Independents emphasize checks and balances, warning that unchecked presidential power threatens liberty regardless of party.
Is Trump Acting Like a King? A Balanced Review
The core question fueling the No Kings Protest is whether President Trump is behaving like a king. Critics argue yes, pointing to his bypassing of Congress through executive orders, emergency declarations, and efforts to control federal spendingactions seen as monarchical. Articles describe Trump as seeking “king-like” control over the executive branch, modeling after figures like Putin, and testing limits of power in ways that overwhelm legislative and judicial checks. The Supreme Court’s immunity ruling is cited as enabling “dictator-like” behavior, with legal experts warning the president can now “behave like a king.”
Defenders counter that Trump is simply governing assertively as elected, arguing his actions align with the voters' will and that accusations are overblown by opponents. Some suggest his “king-like” moves stem from weakness in traditional governance, not malice. In Rare Sense to Save America, I explore how such polarizations arise from a lack of practical, bipartisan solutions and the structural way our government is set up to favor the elites (both parties and the money behind them) instead of We the People.
Conclusion: Applying Rare Sense to Save America
The No Kings Protest reveals a nation grappling with presidential power abuse, authoritarianism, and the need for accountability. Whether you align with Democratic urgency, Republican skepticism, or Independent nuance, one thing is clear: America thrives on balance, not extremes. In my book, Rare Sense to Save America, (https://a.co/d/dmxAYjK) I delve into these issues, offering practical insights to restore rare sense in politics and prevent such divisions from escalating.
Ready to join the conversation? Buy Rare Sense to Save America today and discover how we can collectively save our democracy. Visit www.raresenseamerica.com for more details, exclusive content, and to purchase your copy now!
To read the real We the People movement that will drive actual change go to Read the main hub



Comments